I th()ught it pr()bably was But in my experience it pays t() av()id p()ssible misc()mmunicati()ns as t() whether I am actually g()ing t() physically attack a dude
()f c()urse y()u didn't d() anything, I in n() way find that denial t() be at all suspici()us. I am sure that the absence ()f evidence has n()thing t() d() with y()u having the capacity t() c()ver y()ur tracks and I am certain that, if asked, Zephyr w()uld n()t pr()vide c()nflicting testim()ny ()n this matter. I am p()sitive that y()u h()ld n() resp()nsibility f()r ()ur new venture int() paper-based id()latry in h()n()r ()f Zephyr
I'll make an ann()uncement ()n the b()ard that we're g()ing t() start c()llecting waste paper. I mean unless y()u want t() d() it
no subject
But in my experience it pays t() av()id p()ssible misc()mmunicati()ns as t() whether I am actually g()ing t() physically attack a dude
()f c()urse y()u didn't d() anything, I in n() way find that denial t() be at all suspici()us. I am sure that the absence ()f evidence has n()thing t() d() with y()u having the capacity t() c()ver y()ur tracks and I am certain that, if asked, Zephyr w()uld n()t pr()vide c()nflicting testim()ny ()n this matter. I am p()sitive that y()u h()ld n() resp()nsibility f()r ()ur new venture int() paper-based id()latry in h()n()r ()f Zephyr
I'll make an ann()uncement ()n the b()ard that we're g()ing t() start c()llecting waste paper. I mean unless y()u want t() d() it
-