I mean I guess it pr()bably was kind ()f a sh()ck t() c()me back and find Lili g()ne but yeah It's n()t like this is just s()me feel-g()()d empty m()ral gesture ()n ()ur part? I mean yeah it's partly a wanting t() d() the right thing thing but let's be real it's als() partly a n()t wanting t() get smacked acr()ss the h()rns by a tree thing
Anyway yeah that's a really g()()d idea actually? If we started d()ing that I c()uld take the recycled paper back t() the b()ard f()r pe()ple t() use, t()() It's n()t quite as thin ()r sm()()th as industrially manufactured paper but it's perfectly serviceable. Better than what my lusus used t() make h()nestly And I figure the m()re little gestures t()ward mundane self-sufficiency we can make, the m()re Zephyr can f()cus ()n ()ther things ar()und here
If we start recycling the b()ard n()tes we pr()bably ()ught t() let ()ther pe()ple kn()w bef()re we start th()ugh I mean n()t that the paper w()uldn't all get shredded and g() int() the pr()cessing vat t()gether but I c()uld see h()w s()me pe()ple might get antsy ab()ut s()me()ne else taking the things they p()st? And like I might feel weird ab()ut taking the stuff that gets p()sted under Iz's c()nfessi()nal thing. At least when it's being used the way it's meant t() be used and n()t just Peter being terrible
no subject
It's n()t like this is just s()me feel-g()()d empty m()ral gesture ()n ()ur part?
I mean yeah it's partly a wanting t() d() the right thing thing but let's be real it's als() partly a n()t wanting t() get smacked acr()ss the h()rns by a tree thing
Anyway yeah that's a really g()()d idea actually? If we started d()ing that I c()uld take the recycled paper back t() the b()ard f()r pe()ple t() use, t()()
It's n()t quite as thin ()r sm()()th as industrially manufactured paper but it's perfectly serviceable. Better than what my lusus used t() make h()nestly
And I figure the m()re little gestures t()ward mundane self-sufficiency we can make, the m()re Zephyr can f()cus ()n ()ther things ar()und here
If we start recycling the b()ard n()tes we pr()bably ()ught t() let ()ther pe()ple kn()w bef()re we start th()ugh
I mean n()t that the paper w()uldn't all get shredded and g() int() the pr()cessing vat t()gether but I c()uld see h()w s()me pe()ple might get antsy ab()ut s()me()ne else taking the things they p()st? And like I might feel weird ab()ut taking the stuff that gets p()sted under Iz's c()nfessi()nal thing. At least when it's being used the way it's meant t() be used and n()t just Peter being terrible
-